Professing the Renaissance: The Poetics and Politics of Culture Type: Chapter; Author(s): Louis Montrose; Date: ; Page start: ; Page end: ; Web. Louis Adrian Montrose is an American literary theorist and academic scholar. His scholarship has addressed a wide variety of literary, historical, and theoretical topics and issues, and has significantly shaped contemporary studies of Renaissance poetics, English Renaissance theatre, Louis Montrose’s Homepage · Professing the Renaissance · Miriam Chen’s. Professing the Renaissance: The Poetics and Politics of Culture. Louis A. Montrose. There has recently emerged within Renaissance studies, as in Anglo- Ameri.
|Published (Last):||13 December 2009|
|PDF File Size:||13.42 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.27 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Authority, Gender and Representation. Renaisasnce, it seems as though Montrose is regarded as an example of the New Historicist practice. This allows the New Historicist to ask new questions to literature, such what its influence may have been in the construction of social context or how social context, ideology, has influenced the production of literature This was written over 14 years ago and as of today we still lack this operational definition.
The framework that resulted from this was, however, a derision from several critical introductions to the New Historicism, and thus only a theoretical one. Back to the Profexsing. The distinction between diachronic and synchronic almost seems negligible in this sense: As a consequence, through the analyses of different individual reading methods, the framework can be adapted to ultimately accommodate if possible an even larger shared methodology, or it can be reassessed and changed when these analyses would show that there is a significant difference between theory and practice within the New Historicism.
Humanized, llouis past lives, moves and has its being again but differently — on a higher level — in the present. The Poetics and Politics of Culture. She assumes the following tenets: Aram Veeser defined the following aspects as reoccurring in and thus characteristic of the reading practice that is New Historicism.
Louis Montrose – Wikipedia
So what is the point of searching and describing these poetics in the first place? If, on the other hand, this is a cultural reference, then Montrose cannot be said to be diachronic in the analyses that are studied here. Briefly and too simply characterized, its collective project is to resituate canonical literary texts among the multiple forms of writing, and in relation to the non-discursive practices and institutions, of the social formation in which those texts have been produced—while, at the same time, recognizing that this project of historical resituation is necessarily the textual construction of critics who are themselves historical subjects.
I hope that my thesis provides an answer to a yet unexplored question within the existing research on the New Historicism.
Compared to Greenblatt, who is cited innumerable times within the introductory texts, the amount of citations by Montrose is almost genaissance The following analyses will be considered for this comparison: While comparative genetic criticism would be necessary to discover who voiced these basic premises first, the fact they seem recurring in some form of another in the seven introductory texts, sometimes in almost identical terms, cannot be regarded as coincidence.
Rather, it advocates a shared interest in each one of these four aspects, as hinted at above. While this can indeed be taken as diachronic, the focus is different: Neil Badmington from Cardiff University for his kindness and help with this thesis.
For example, the practice and its practitioners have not always identified themselves as being New Historicist, since there are quite some synonyms for the New Historicism: To attempt this within the scope montrse this thesis would be, however, quite unfeasible.
Some make comparisons between a play and a pamphlet, a novel and medical literature, a letter and a cant term.
I mean to suggest a process of subjectification that, on the one hand, shapes individuals as loci of consciousness and initiators of action, endows them with subjectivity; and that, on the other hand, positions, motivates, and constrains them within – subjects them to – social networks and cultural codes that exceed their comprehension or control.
Although this is supposed to be a conclusion, I believe it would be wrong to make definite statements about the status of the New Historicism. Explorations in Literature and History. Together with other remnants, relics and vestiges of the past, they craft a social context anthropologically.
For the purpose of consistency, this thesis refers to him simply as Montrose, Louis in the bibliography, disregarding whatever form of his name the original publication states, and as Montrose within the running text. Although montrosse thesis will not be able to go into detail as to what the theoretical foundations of that shared methodology may be, it will through close reading of these several introductory texts try motrose come to a certain set of key assumptions about the practice of the New Historicism, which relate to the four aspects Abrams defined as being crucial to poetics.
While it would be foolish to assume that this thesis would be able to unravel the New Historicist poetics here, the first part of this thesis will compare several introductions on the New Historicism in order to distil what are commonly accepted as the crucial aspects of the literary phenomenon as theorised by this literary practice.
Some reconstruct discourse by examining extraneous cultural artefacts.
When considering the last given quote, about the politics of the practice emerging through the analysis of the New Historicist, and assuming that this has a direct relation to this issue, there is however plenty evidence in the other texts: While I was on Erasmus in Cardiff during the second semester of this academic year, I was always welcome in his office with any questions and he never ceased to be friendly and helpful, even if he had little time. As is clear from the selection of texts above, this thesis will refrain from using material fhe was written by Stephen Greenblatt, for several reasons: And lastly, I would like to thank my wonderful girlfriend Ine Verheyen, for her support and also for correcting my work and spotting the odd comma, which is not my strong suit; thank you very much.
However, if we were to ask them to define what the New Historicism is, most of them would struggle to do so. This is however only a very ths exploration in the poetics of the New Historicism.
Louis Montrose | Literary Theory and Criticism
According to Hens-Piazzathe text and the cultural practices that lead to it has to be seen in materialistic terms Veeser and Dollimore employ a similar terminology: The label of New Historicism will sound familiar to most students of literature. I hope that all readers may be able to enjoy my work. While Michaels is indeed considered a New Historicist, the article in itself is at least ambiguous: Dollimore, Jonathan and Alan Sinfield. A Conversation with the Living: This is, however, a task for those to follow; the length of this thesis does not allow for such an extensive research.
During the harsh winter of and the first months ofwhilst preparing a PhD-application for the FWO, we agreed that something was missing in the study of the New Historicism.
Unlike the two other analyses, the b text also shows signs of a diachronic approach, despite what Montrose b: