REVIEWS. Jonathan Culler, On Deconstruction. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pages. Christopher Norris, Deconstruction: Theory and Practice. Criticism and Institutions: The American an Culler – – In Derek Attridge, Geoffrey Bennington & Robert Young (eds.), Post-Structuralism. Jonathan Culler, On deconstruction: Theory and criticism after structuralism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, Pp. – Volume 13 Issue.
|Published (Last):||1 July 2017|
|PDF File Size:||17.20 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||3.14 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
But from Axiom Two the collapse into the contrary we know that when a thought arises from a momentary play of differences it will never be available as a stable present. This movement is the hallmark of Derridean criticism.
At the second level, a powerful theory with literary implications seeks to analyse those structures which it takes to be most fundamental or characteristic, and thus emphasises repetition But experience always has this divided, duplicated character; it has always already occurred and yet is still to be produced.
Publisher Cornell University Press. He belongs to a school of modern philosophy cullrr has representatives in both the Anglo-American and Continental camps and includes such diverse names as Wittgenstein, Heidegger, Quine and Sellars — all of whom, despite their diversity, are united in their criticism of the idea that knowledge can have a firm foundation in anything.
Cornell Jomathan Press Amazon. Structuralism and Post-Structuralism Contrasted. Derrida holds that mental life is purely temporal, is just one-thing-after-another; one moment is always different from another moment of mental life. Similarly, just as the New Criticism tended to find that the subject of literature was literature, Deconstruction finds that the subject of literature is Deconstruction.
But after spending twenty pages in analysing recent work on the subject, he summarises feminist criticism as follows: Stories of Reading pp.
It simply marks the end of the myth of the given. What we thought to be present turns out to be absent; what we thought to be marginal we discover to be central. Subtitle Theory and Criticism after Cullerr. Writing and Logocentrism 2.
David Carrier – – Praeger. The meaning that arises from the play of differences is therefore never present, but is always being deferred. Culler states the critical implications of the principle: In the second mode, the problem is how to make it possible to read as a woman The trouble with keeping that tradition going under a new deconstructive guise is not that it is wrong or radical, or inhumane, but that the tradition of academic literary analysis is uncommitted to any cultural values at all.
This Jonathan Culler has supplied in On Deconstruction with his customary lucidity and care. Critical Consequences Chapter Three. Michael Traynor – – Nursing Inquiry 6 3: When one attempts to formulate the distinction between reading and misreading, one inevitably relies on some notion of identity and difference. This edition marks the twenty-fifth anniversary of the first publication of this landmark work and includes a new preface by the author that surveys deconstruction’s history since the s and assesses its place within cultural theory today.
Literary Theory and Criticism.
On Deconstruction: Theory and Criticism After Structuralism – Jonathan Culler – Google Books
But deconstruction as a philosophy holds no more implications for reading books than does, say, the philosophy of Bishop Berkeley. Chapter One Readers and Reading. Unfortunately for the coherence of that philosophy, deferment and difference do not fit together harmoniously.
Incorporating Limits with Austin and Derrida. This baffled even Derrida, as he told me some years back. He does not address the non-literary, cultural question as to why Derrida should have caught on in the American academic scene.
This article has no associated abstract. Structuralism, Linguistics and the Study of Literature.
Request removal from index. Difference is thus monistic, even idealistic, in flavour. Formalism has deconsruction American literary study away from these authentic and original cultural purposes.
Culture in the Transitions to Modernity: The Pursuit of Signs: Edition Notes 25th Anniversary Edition. No keywords specified fix it. Such tendencies to monism are a persistent danger for deconstructionists, and a danger that they rarely avoid in practice. The normal view had been that speech is the basis of language, and thus of thought.
Title First Published 03 January Common terms and phrases aesthetic Allegories of Reading analysis analyzes argues argument attempt Austin Barthes Billy Billy Budd Claggart claim concept context critique decon deconstruction deconstructive criticism deconstructive readings defined Derrida describe determine difference jonatyan discussion distinction effects ence English trans essay example experience explore feminine feminist criticism figure force frame Freud genre graft grammatologie hierarchical oppositions ical identify illocutionary force insight interpretation Jacques Derrida language linguistic literary criticism literary theory literature logic logocentrism M.