The Danish applicant was convicted for aiding and abetting the dissemination Jersild v Denmark (App no /89) ECHR 23 September (PDF, KB) . References: Times Oct, () 19 EHRR 1,  ECHR 33, /89, Links: Bailii, Bailii Ratio: A journalist was wrongly convicted. JERSILD v. DENMARK. AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF. Application No. / 89 by Jens Olaf JERSILD against Denmark. The European Commission of.
|Published (Last):||22 March 2004|
|PDF File Size:||8.47 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.64 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Jersild v Denmark, ECHR (1994)
This process and period is called the third folk revival and reached a zenith in the s. But we, we have enough problems in getting our social benefits, man, they just get it.
jersidl We believe Denmark is for the Danes. The applicant and the Commission were of the jersile that, notwithstanding Denmark’s obligations as a Party to the UN Convention see paragraph 21 abovea fair balance had to be struck between the “protection of the reputation or rights of others” and the applicant’s right to impart information. The dissenting member was of the view that, although the statements by the Greenjackets constituted offences under Article b of the Penal Code, the applicant and Mr Jensen had not transgressed the bounds of the freedom of speech to be enjoyed by television and other media, since the object of the programme was to inform about and animate public discussion on the particular racist attitudes and social background of the youth group in question.
On 24 Septemberin the presence of the Registrar, the President drew by lot the names of the other seven members, namely Mr R. The last two jersjld indicate the case’s position on the list of cases referred to the Court since its creation and on the list of the corresponding originating applications to the Commission.
Accordingly, it was by no means the intention of Danmarks Radio to persuade others to subscribe to the same views as the Greenjackets, rather the contrary. Hans Engell topic Hans Engell born 8 October is a Copenhagen born Danish former politician and journalist, who until 6 September was the editor-in-chief of the tabloid Ekstra Bladet, a position he had held for seven years. A showing was held shortly before the hearing v.denmzrk 20 April. jetsild
Member feedback about Dansk Melodi Grand Prix winners: List of Swedish-language writers topic This is a list of Swedish-language novelists, poets and other writers. The phrase “wardrobe malfunction” is coined during the ensuing controversy. Counsel, referring inter alia to the above-mentioned article in Information, also pointed to the fact that no consistent prosecution policy had been followed in cases of this nature.
Jersild v. Denmark
In accordance with the President’s decision, the hearing took place in public in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on 20 April V.renmark judgment of 28 AugustSeries A no.
Member feedback about Physician writer: In the applicant’s further jeesild, this explained why the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, when urging member States to ratify the UN Convention, had proposed that they add an interpretative statement to their instrument of ratification, which would, inter jerssild, stress that respect was also due for the rights laid down in the European Convention Resolution 68 30 adopted by the Ministers’ Deputies on 31 October Swedish folk music is a genre of music based largely on folkloric collection work that began in the early 19th century in Sweden.
Jerxild research ranges from basic neuroscience, genetics and epidemiology, through The Government’s argument, as the Court understands it, is that, whilst Article 10 art. Without his involvement, the remarks would not have been disseminated to a wide circle of people and would thus not have been punishable see paragraphs 14 and 18 above. UNHCR is not responsible for, nor does it necessarily endorse, its content.
Jersild v Denmark – Wikipedia
There are indeed two major principles at issue in this case, one being that of freedom of expression, embodied in Article 10 art. Where do they come from?
The clause had been introduced at the drafting stage because of concern among a number of States that the requirement in Article 4 a that “[States Parties] shall declare an offence punishable by law all dissemination of ideas based on racial superiority or hatred” was too sweeping jerild could give rise to difficulties with regard to other human rights, in particular the right to freedom of opinion and expression.
G No, not really. In earlier decisions the Court has – in our view, rightly – underlined the great importance of the freedom of the press and the media in general for a democratic society, but it has never had to consider a situation in which “the reputation or rights of others” Article 10 para.
Their news or information value was not such as to justify their dissemination and therefore did not warrant acquitting the defendants. The particular Circumstance of the Case. The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as vd.enmark prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.
Jersild v Denmark | Revolvy
Whilst it is desirable to allow the press the best possible conditions for reporting on society, press freedom cannot be unlimited since freedom of expression is coupled with responsibilities. Gotchev Article 43 in fine of the Convention and V.denmwrk 21 para.
The transcript of the Greenjackets item reads as follows [ I: Accordingly, it was by no means the intention of Danmarks Radio to persuade others to subscribe to the same views as the Greenjackets, rather the contrary.