Lantz, A.: Intervjumetodik – Den professionellt genomförda intervjun (in Swedish). Studentlitteratur. () 6. Abrahamsen, P.: Samarbete, samverkan, samvaro. Kvale, Steinar Den kvalitativa forskningsintervjun. Studentlitteratur, Lund. Lantz, Annika Intervjumetodik. Studentlitteratur, Lund. Marander-Eklund. Author: Lantz, Annika, Publication year: Language: Swedish. Media class: Book. Publisher: W&W,. ISBN:
|Published (Last):||9 April 2010|
|PDF File Size:||9.42 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||2.35 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
In the following sections, we first outline a model of effective teamwork and then go deeper into aspects and processes inteevjumetodik research has shown to be important for team effectiveness. Our aim is to contribute to research on workplace innovation by identifying tasks within industrial Lean Production Systems LPS that can trigger the involvement of teams in workplace innovation.
Supportive leadership has an effect on group processes that in turn impact group initiative and self-organizational activities and a direct effect on group initiative as well. The authors include also representatives of several international organizations. The non-standardized tasks take very little time, and are not more cognitively demanding than the main tasks, and yet impact team proactivity to a considerable extent as they give input to building a shared meaning of work.
To reduce nonvalue-adding activities means to standardize work procedures and hence to reduce autonomy. A clear distinction between autonomy and participation contributes to the understanding of the links between job design, learning processes and team proactivity.
We start this chapter by describing positive outcomes of teamwork for the individual, the team and the organization. Learning at the workplace is essential for long-term employability, and for job satisfaction and health. Within the production all tasks that go beyond the production when it runs well, involve other functions. The implications for future research and practice are discussed.
Our conclusion is that teams within LPS can be engaged in workplace innovation depending on how they take on additional tasks, as these impact team learning. In this study we explored conditions for team learning and proactive behaviour within one specific context and version of the lean concept; the Volvo Production System VPS. In this paper our aim is to investigate the role of cross-boundary collaboration CBC for team learning and proactivity, and identify hindrances and prerequisites for such collaboration.
Research methods in Human-Computer Interaction (2D5339, HMI 651), Fall 2000
Annika Lantz, Peter Friedrich. Mediation analysis showed that additional work tasks, taking little time, have an impact on team proactivity through team learning.
The purpose of this paper is to explore job design mechanisms that enhance team proactivity within a lean production system where autonomy is uttermost restricted. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Organizations 3 2 Lean production System LPS has been widely implemented in intervjumetodio in different sectors all over the world Wittrock, Creativity and Innovation in Organizations.
How can such proactive behavior be inyervjumetodik Chapter Leaned teamwork fattens workplace innovation. Postal intervjumetdik Psykologiska institutionen 91 Stockholm. The principles of job design of intervjimetodik tasks, e. Conference Cross-boundary collaboration and team innovation. How do we want to work tomorrow? The results are based on work task analysis two studies and questionnaires. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 25 4 Article Participative work design in lean production.
Reflectivity and group initiative show the largest effects on self-organizational activities. Very few studies have investigated the paradox between lean and teamwork, yet many lean-inspired productions systems have teamwork as a pillar for enhancing effectiveness.
This study contributes to the research on team learning and transactive memory as it underline the importance of shared perceptions on team level for proactivity to emerge.
We finish with an overview of the main findings and discuss how contextual and situational aspects impact team processes, and how factors on individual, team and organizational levels interact. Conference Teamwork within lean production or the paradox between standardization of work and innovation.
An Introduction to Work and Organizational Psychology, Annika Lantz, Kin Andersson.
Annika Lantz Friedrich – Stockholm University
The aim of the study is to explore job design practices that enhance team proactivity within a lean production system where autonomy is uttermost restricted. In this study, we explored relations between task complexity, team learning, and team innovation processes.
We propose and test a model where the team learning process of building shared meaning of work mediates the relationship inteervjumetodik team participative decision-making, inter team relations and team proactive behaviour.
How can effects of teamwork be explained and thus be enhanced? Job design captured by work task analysis gives a better model fit and has a larger impact on self-organizational activities than self-assessed autonomy. In this study, we explored relations between task complexity, team learning, and proactivity. Works at Department of Psychology. Links Psykologiska institutionen Arbets- och organisationspsykologi. A conclusion is that the potential for team-learning processes and proactivity lies in those work activities that are not standardized, and good inter-team collaboration in the work-flow.
The meaningfulness of the model was tested both in contexts where proactive behavior and self-organizational activities are desirable and in a context where proactive behavior can be damaging.
A conclusion is that teams within LPS can be engaged in workplace innovation depending on how they take on additional tasks, as these impact team learning. This study develops a previous model on the relationship between job design, group processes, group initiative and self-organizational activities by including supportive leadership.