AMEER MUAWIYA AUR TAREEKHI HAQAIQ PDF

Hazrat Muaviyah [r.a] Aur Tareekhi Haqaiq By Shaykh Mufti Taqi Usmani A FAMOUS BOOK WRITTEN IN DEFENCE OF HAZRAT MUAVIA [R.A] Hazrat Ameer Muaviyah [r.a] Aur Tareekhi Rivayaat By Shaykh Muhammad. Ameer Muawiya Aur Tareekhi Haqaiq Author Mufti Taqi Usmani. May Click to Download Click to Read on Scribd. Post a Comment. For More Islamic Books For More Islamic Books Visit For More I.

Author: Akikinos Fenrit
Country: Latvia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Spiritual
Published (Last): 26 December 2006
Pages: 305
PDF File Size: 5.43 Mb
ePub File Size: 1.7 Mb
ISBN: 408-5-19403-976-4
Downloads: 33357
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Nigore

It is completely wrong to consider Hazrat Mu’awiya as the person who transformed Khilafat into Malukiyat. He will decide this issue on the Day of Judgment. My point is that if you want to quote an example it should be a good example. Whatever is the opinion of Sunnis, Shias or Khawarij on such issues, it is no more than a theory based on doubtful reports because Sunni reports are not acceptable to Shia and vice versa.

Nobody believes that Sahaba were free from sin.

Hazrat Ameer Muawiyah Radi Allahu Anhu | Urdu Islamic Books PDF Download for free Online Library

Since the matter is grave, we should evaluate the authenticity of the events reported by the history. If someone blames our father, should we accept his accusations without any assessment?

I appreciate that you study the history. If someone portrays a bad picture amee any respected person for you e.

  DICCIONARIO DE LA ESTUPIDEZ HUMANA RIUS PDF

I agree with you that narrations from such people should not be accepted in other matters even it is in favor of our view. I hope you ll not think that I am a Shia because ‘I am not’. The views presented in the books aug to their authors and they are responsible for providing the answer raised on their work.

Hazrat Muavia r.a Aur Tareekhi Haqaiq By Shaykh Mufti Taqi Usmani

We should consider the following facts about these issues: So why should we accept narrations from such people who portray a bad picture of such personalities? Many thanks for your kind words and comments about my books.

Assalam o alaikum wa Rahmatullah. As far as Hxqaiq studied the history, I’ve reached at the conclusion that it is not possible to settle a disputed issue based on a historical reports. You can download and see through the chapters related to the years ranging from 30 to 65H.

But I’ll advise you to not rely on me and conduct your own study. There is a discipline in the historical studies that deals with criticism on historical events.

Only that person will reach at a real conclusion who was present at that occasion and bears eyewitness of an incident. Details of this procedure are available here: We are free to form opinions within this life. Similarly, Banu A’bbas did the same to defame the Ummayyads. Nobody engages in a revolt with a handful of companions including his family members and young children.

  DD2875 FORM PDF

Why should we rely on secondary sources? When the matter muawuya only an issue of doubtful reports, why should we form our opinions based on them.

The approach of Tabari was to compile all the narrations whether authentic or not in a chronological order. He only compiled the traditions and did not perform evaluation of such reports.

Hazrat Muaviyah [r.a] Aur Tareekhi Haqaiq By Shaykh Mufti Taqi Usmani |

The length of ruling period is not a sign of patients. Wa alaikum us salam wa Rahmatullah. The book is available at the following links: It is very logical.

There is no doubt that the incident of Karbala is a grave incident of our history. Rest of the books are written on the basis of his compilation. Recently, a group of Arab scholars named BarzanjiHallaqZia al- U’mri and Khalil have conducted that evaluation and found that large number of reports in this book are fake.

You can check by yourselves in the “History of Tabari ” that all reports portraying a sleazy picture of the companions are reported by only five persons and all of them are considered as “liars “.