Doc AN Airworthiness Manual. Volume I. Organization and Procedures. Approved by the Secretary General and published under his authority. The Airworthiness Manual (Doc ) was first published in in two volumes and contained a consolidation of airworthiness-related information previously. Doc AN Airworthiness Manual. Volume II. Design Certification and. Continuing Airworthiness. Approved by the Secretary General.
|Published (Last):||10 November 2010|
|PDF File Size:||8.64 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.12 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Normally, these work products will have received an airworthiness approval or other form of airworthinezs from an AA. For example, for most military organizations, operational effectiveness is paramount and, therefore, aviation safety objectives must be balanced against the need to accept higher levels of risk wherever operational circumstances dictate.
Reference should also be made to M.
Source for ICAO Airworthiness Manual (doc ) – PPRuNe Forums
Although the airworthines bears the legal responsibility for continuing airworthiness, there is very much a shared responsibility between:. Continuing Airworthiness is therefore not just the maintenance of aircraft and equipment, but also involves monitoring performance of products in service. It is useful to compare Continued and Continuing as they are sometimes used interchangeably. Terms, conditions and sustainment requirements are normally articulated in a recognition certificate and the supporting documentation.
There was a problem providing the content you requested
While MAAs may closely align with many of the international civilian airworthiness processes, by necessity, military aviation has a different risk context and will employ military design standards.
Cranfield University Content control: TAM Part 1, Chapter 4 — Assignment of Technical Airworthiness Authority describes the rules and standards for determining the acceptability of organizations that have been assigned airworthiness management roles or airworthiness functions by a regulatory authority other than the TAA.
When granting recognition, the TAA will specify any associated terms or condition. The generic term for any of the following: In the words of ICAO:.
Furthermore, there is no single, internationally recognized organization that sets standards or harmonizes the military airworthiness and aviation requirements of MAAs.
While the review process includes both a desktop and an onsite review, the output of the desktop review can be sufficiently comprehensive to preclude the requirement for the onsite review. This is an approved organisation responsible for implementation of continuing airworthiness management tasks. The process by which the TAA will undertake this recognition could include:. 970 on how it is structured within the state, the airworthiness authority may be established as a sub-component of the larger Civil Aviation Authority.
It remains the responsibility of the TAA to account for any differences in standards and processes, and to decide how any identified gaps are to be managed.
The ultimate responsibility for continued airworthiness is assigned in ICAO Annex 8 to the State of Design but the programme to achieve continuing airworthiness is a matter for the State of Registry.
Source for ICAO Airworthiness Manual (doc 9760)
Military Authorities Recognition Question Set. Retrieved from ” https: Limitations and Constraints 4. For each of its aircraft, the approved CAMO is required to carry out the following functions. Continuing Airworthiness management is the process by which an aircraft is kept in a condition where it remains airworthy throughout its life – or in other wordsi.
Examples may include any of the following: Common to the efforts between these agencies is the use of a standardized assessment tool, based on ICAO documents references g. Finally, in the military context, recognition can improve flexibility and capacity during joint operations. The recognition process follows four basic phases:. Information is provided related to:. The process used by the TAA for establishing acceptability of the work and artefacts of another airworthiness regulatory authority is called recognition.
Key coordinated efforts have been sponsored by:. Sustainment usually relates to the requirement to communicate any change to the conditions under which the recognition was originally issued. A recognition does not expire. TAM Part 2, Chapter 5 — Type Design Examination TDE describes the rules and standards for the acceptance of work performed, and airworthiness artefacts issued, by other airworthiness authorities in relation to initial type certification or major design maunal approval.
As stated in para 4. Recognition — Civil Aviation Authorities 4. Once the regulatory Section Heads have completed their reviews, they provide a summary of their findings to DTAES 2, who collates them into a preliminary report.
Cranfield University Publication Authority: If you wish to contribute or participate in the discussions about articles you are invited to join SKYbrary as a registered user.
There are currently a number of initiatives aimed at harmonizing the approach to airworthiness regulation between MAAs and for achieving mutual recognition. Reference j represents a Akrworthiness staff instruction that covers how companies providing services under contract to DND are recognized.
The scope of recognition is limited to those airworthiness functions that fall within the assigned responsibility of the respective AA. This standardized assessment tool has been tailored for the military context and takes the form of a question set called the Military Authorities Recognition Question set MARQ reference i. The national military airworthiness authority of a state responsible aidworthiness the airworthiness of the airworhtiness aircraft of that state.
This also includes acceptance of TCCA organizational approvals related to maintenance, design, manufacturing and materiel support services for civil-derived aeronautical products; and U.